Presidential Recount

Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – “I have to ask the question: Why is Jill Stein instigating a recount?  Ms. Stein has absolutely no shot whatsoever to win a solitary, single electoral vote in any state in the union, much less Wisconsin.  I’m going to tell you what’s going on here, folks, but first some of the nitty-gritty details.”  Check out today’s transcript for the rest….

Begin Mike Church Show Transcript

Mike:  Folks, we’ve got a little bit of news to get to here today.  Here’s a headline for you.  This is from the Washington Compost, “Clinton campaign will participate in Wisconsin recount, with an eye on ‘outside interference,’ lawyer says.”  Really?

[reading]

Republicans and Democrats react to the announcement that Hillary Clinton’s campaign plans to join a vote recount in Wisconsin initiated by former Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein.

[end reading]

Mike:  I have to ask the question: Why is Jill Stein instigating a recount?  Ms. Stein has absolutely no shot whatsoever to win a solitary, single electoral vote in any state in the union, much less Wisconsin.  I’m going to tell you what’s going on here, folks, but first some of the nitty-gritty details.

[reading]

Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign has been quietly exploring whether there was any “outside interference” in the election results and will participate in the election recount in Wisconsin initiated by Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein, a Clinton campaign lawyer revealed Saturday.

In a Medium post, Clinton campaign lawyer Marc Elias said that the campaign had received “hundreds of messages, emails, and calls urging us to do something, anything, to investigate claims that the election results were hacked and altered in a way to disadvantage Secretary Clinton,” [Mike: That’s the pot calling the kettle black, isn’t it?] especially in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania, where the “combined margin of victory for Donald Trump was merely 107,000 votes.”

[end reading]

[private FP-Monthly|FP-Yearly|FP-Yearly-WLK|FP-Yearly-So76]

Mike:  Merely?  Folks, do you see how they use the terminology?  “Merely 107,000 votes”?  Here’s a reality check.  What could you do with 107,000 dollar bills?  What could you do with 107,000 Snickers bars?  What could you do with 107,000 five-dollar McDonald’s Christmas gift certificates?  Run the experiment out.  107,000 votes is not a sniveling matter, but it’s been made so that, [mocking] “See, there’s hope!”  Let me tell you what’s going on here with this, folks.  One more part of the news:

[reading]

Elias said the campaign had “not uncovered any actionable evidence of hacking or outside attempts to alter the voting technology.” But because of the margin of victory — and because of the degree of apparent foreign interference during the campaign [Mike: Where was there foreign interference? And if there was foreign interference, it came in the form of illegal aliens voting for Dumbocrats as they have been doing since 1992.]— Elias said that Clinton officials had “quietly taken a number of steps in the last two weeks to rule in or out any possibility of outside interference in the vote tally in these critical battleground states.”

He said that the Clinton campaign would participate in the Stein-initiated recount in Wisconsin by having representatives on the ground monitoring the count and having lawyers represent them in court if needed. And if Stein made good on efforts to prompt similar processes in Pennsylvania and Michigan, Elias said, the Clinton campaign would do so there, as well.

“The campaign is grateful to all those who have expended time and effort to investigate various claims of abnormalities and irregularities,” Elias said. “While that effort has not, in our view, resulted in evidence of manipulation of results, now that a recount is underway, we believe we have an obligation to the more than 64 million Americans who cast ballots for Hillary Clinton to participate in ongoing proceedings to ensure that an accurate vote count will be reported.”

[end reading]

Mike:  Do you see what’s going on here, folks?  Many people are going to think that what’s going on here is about stuffing ballot boxes and discovering some kind of subterfuge here and trying to reverse the election results.  While I’m sure there are a bunch of whackos out there that refuse to accept the election result, that is a pipedream for them.  Let me explain to you what is really going on here.  We can do this by taking the sheet of paper I have this story printed on.  Let’s revisit one of our favorite subjects.  I’ll draw it with a Sharpie, that way it’s easier to see.  I’m going to draw a ginormous circle on the back of this piece of paper.  Right in the middle, I’m going to put a tiny dot.  The famous lesson we do here on this show.  Giant circle, tiny dot in the middle.

This is the famous inner circle/outer circle explanation of why government has become so corrupt as it has in America in 2016.  Of course, it was corrupt in 1992 and ’82 and ’72, ’62, go back.  It’s growing more corrupt until this outer circle begins to shrink.  What am I showing you?  The outer circle is the parasite circle.  The inner circle, the tiny dot, that’s the elected class.  Take a good look.  If you’re listening and can’t see the video, I’ll describe it to you.  I have an 8 ½ x 11-inch size of paper.  I have drawn an 8 ½ inch circle.  In the middle of that circle, I have taken the point of a pen and placed as small a dot as I’m capable of placing there.

What I’m demonstrating to you is that the outer circle is made possible by the inner circle.  The little dot represents the actual elected class.  The large circle represents all the parasites, all the glommers, all the criminals, all the benighted, all the gilded.  Some of them are actually doing some tasks that are legitimate and needed, about five percent of them.  About five percent of them are actually performing a governmental task that is worthy or that is, A, constitutional, and, B, may actually have a purpose to carry out some kind of constitutional function.  The rest of them are parasites.  They have been put into action by a ruling elite that can get away with this because of what we know today as withholding taxes and other taxes that you don’t actually have to pay because you never see the money.  They never actually allow you access to the money so that it is taken from you before you ever see it.  That’s one of the other scams here.  Make no mistake about it, the parasite class exists.  They exist in media; they exist in think tanks; they exist as government contractors.  It would take me the next four and a half years to explain all those that are in the large outer circle.

Why do I show you that?  What does that have to do with Trump and Clinton and the recount?  This is an attempt here, obviously, not even a thinly-veiled attempt, to keep those in the outer circle – remember, Mrs. Clinton was denied access to the inner circle.  She lost.  She has no access to the inner circle now.  That means that many of those parasites that were relying on her, that’s why so many of them are upset.  They may actually have to go find something productive to do.  I’m sure that most of them will find something not productive to do.  Until there is this major, massive correction of the $4.5 trillion all-you-can-eat buffet, the outer circle will remain largely intact.

The Trump administration gets to appoint or assist in appointing the people that work in the outer circle.  I’m showing you this story here because what’s happening in Wisconsin, we could just call it the tale of the outer circle.  It’s just another one.  All of these lawyers, do you think they’re going to Wisconsin for free?  All these volunteers that are going to monitor, [mocking] “We’ll have staff on the ground monitoring the recount.”  Oh, yeah?  At whose expense?  Who pays for that?  Who pays for you, Mr. Elias?  Who pays for your staff?  Who pays for your airfare?  Who pays for your travel?  I have a suggestion.  Here’s who pays.  If you’re driving, look in the rearview mirror.  You.  You pay for this.  This is just a flimsy, sad excuse to keep the Clintonistas in that outer circle, to keep them fat and flush with cash all the way up till Christmas.  Merry Christmas, America.  That’s your Christmas present from the Clinton campaign.

I don’t know the deceitful, diabolical, disgusting ways in which the fundage will actually be transferred from your wallet and my wallet to theirs, but I do know that it will happen.  I also know this.  If there was the proverbial snowball’s chance in Hades that there was going to be a recount that was going to have any significance to it, in other words, if the result of the election was actually going to be altered, we would know this because a certain someone or ones would be privy to secure information, things that only a president elect would know or need to know.  That’s not happening.  Mrs. Clinton is doing this, probably while looking for a place to hide out with Julian Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy, or trying to discover whether or not there is an extradition treaty between the United States and the Maldives.  That’s a place the Clintons have property.  All this is just a ruse.  This is just continuing the gravy train.  That’s all it is.  That’s how sick this is.

We have this from the AP yesterday:

[reading]

A senior Donald Trump adviser is calling Hillary Clinton’s decision to join a recount effort “incredible” and noting that the president-elect has not ruled out pursuing a criminal investigation into his former Democratic rival.

[end reading]

[/private]

Mike:  Remember, last week many of you were up in arms over this.  [mocking] “I told you Trump was going to betray us.  I told ya!”  He wasn’t going to do this, he wasn’t going to do that.  He was going to violate his campaign promise, blah, blah, blah.  Maybe not.  I’ve got to ask the question, though, I really do: Why is Kellyanne Conway or anyone that is a member of the Trump transition team giving the Clinton News Network the patina of legitimacy?  They’re not legitimate.  They’re a bunch of paranoid liberal hacks.  They’re liars, as Trump adequately called them last week.  Why use them as a news source?  Why even appear on their programs?  Especially after calling them out for what they are.  It remains a mystery if you ask me.

[reading]

Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway told CNN’s “State of the Nation” that Trump has not ruled out a criminal probe into Clinton’s use of a private email server as secretary of state, even though Trump recently indicated he’d rather not do so.

[end reading]

Mike:  Are you catching the metrics here, “He’d rather not do so”?  Last week some of you had jumped to the conclusion, [mocking] “Well, he’s not gonna prosecute.  See, I told ya!”  No, it says he’d rather not do so.  This is a nice little telegraph to Mrs. Clinton.  You jump in on this ridiculous recount and keep all of us at odds with each other throughout the entire month of December, watch what’s going to happen on January 21^st, Hillary.

[reading]

FOLKS, a message from Mike – The Project 76 features, Church Doctrine videos and everything else on this site are supported by YOU. We have over 70, of my personally designed, written, produced and directed products for sale in the Founders Tradin’ Post, 24/7,  here. You can also support our efforts with a Founders Pass membership granting total access to years of My work for just .23 cents per day. Thanks for 17 years of mike church.com! – Mike

Conway said, “He’s been incredibly gracious and magnanimous to Secretary Clinton at a time when, for whatever reason, her folks are saying they will join in a recount to try to somehow undo the 70-plus electoral votes that he beat her by.”

She added, “The idea that we are going to drag this out now where the president-elect has been incredibly magnanimous to the Clintons and to the Obamas is pretty incredible.”

Trump took to Twitter Sunday morning to condemn the Green-Party backed recount effort as “a scam.” Clinton’s team joined the effort in Wisconsin after Green Party nominee Jill Stein filed paperwork formally requesting a recount.

[end reading]

Mike:  You’ve got to ask the question: What does Jill Stein want a recount for?  I don’t even know how many votes Ms. Stein got, but I know that the percentage was less than one.  What is the point of that?

End Mike Church Show Transcript