insert_link Daily Clip You Want the Truth? 309 Million Citizen Journalists Couldn’t Handle the Truth! todayMarch 11, 2024 38
insert_link Daily Clip Mike Church Show FREE PREVIEW – Vattel and Publius Prove Founders’ Stand on Natural Born Citizenship todayAugust 13, 2020 19
Scott Thomson on September 20, 2012 It makes sense to me King Dude. Ignorance breeds fear. Wisdom of the truth dispels fear. With “10,000” representatives, there would be more accountability created by visability within a smaller geographical district. This would provide citizens greater access to a representative, for feedback and the opportunity to monitor their work (and ethics). Hmmm, to ponder the difficult and face the truth, or cower in alluring ignorance? What will we do? Log in to Reply
Randall on September 21, 2012 Scott, What you say makes sense, as Mike has said it as well. However, I do not believe it would solve the accountability problem. It would however show beyond the shadow of a doubt just how out of scale this thing is. Imagine trying to get 10,000 representatives to vote. Not agree and have a majority, but just show up to vote. Now this would be great for those of wanting smaller government, because they would not be able to get anything done. It would also be horrible, because it would open the door for any president, no matter the party, to do what Obama is doing now when he does not get his way and start issuing unilateral executive orders. I was one of those who was scared at first to think about breaking the country up, but upon deep reflection and listening to the case being made, I cannot see it ending any other way. Log in to Reply
Scott Thomson on September 23, 2012 Thanks for your thoughts Randall. I was not thinking that we could have 10,000 representatives, per one nation, with one president. We need many more autonomous countries. If we split into many independent countries, then there would be that many more presidents, one per country (if a country decided to have a president). Instead of one representative per millions, how about one per 30,000 citizens? Wouldn’t that create more accountability? It is all about creating a reasonable scale of government, accountable to the electorate. Our government is way overdue for a split, as it could never be expected to realistically represent all of it’s citizens. If the constitution were still alive, it would be more evident that we are more like 50 countries in a limited union, than one centrally-governed country. As the government grows, the corruption of government grows exponentially. Eventually, it will collapse under it’s own weight. Then we can consider things like ‘reasonable scale’ in earnest. Log in to Reply
jmb on September 20, 2012 Mike, I agree with you 99.9% of the time, but God forbid we had 10,000 representatives. As it is, we have 535 (most of whom are leaches) drawing outrageous salaries, health benefits and perks. Imagine where we would be with 10,000 of them. I still say that they should be NON paying positions with no benefits. I am all for breaking up the monster. Log in to Reply
Wil Shrader Jr. on September 20, 2012 I think fear is more plausible than sheer ignorance, though there is much of that. It is easier to dismiss these ideas than to face the difficult task of proceeding, if one concludes it necessary. Not only fear of the risks involved but fear of the unknown. This is like questioning your own sanity; to break free from the idea that because something is that it is right and ought to be; to question whether it ought to be and why. Being a minority in this does not help either. Log in to Reply
insert_link Mike Church Presents The Red Pill Diaries Podcasts Listener Calls Crusade Channel “Rolex Quality” – The Mike Church Show todayFebruary 27, 2018 1655
The CRUSADE Channel & Mike Church Show Achieve Milestone of Episode 2,000! Celebrate “Y2K-D” With Us!
The Constitution Hour Episode 13-Why Trump IS A Natural Born Citizen & Cruz Is Not-Why The Founders Chose republicanism Over Monarchy