insert_link Liberty FLASHBACK: Paleocons vs Libertarians in Russell Kirk’s “Chirping Sectaries” todayNovember 10, 2021 26
insert_link Liberty The Declaration of Independence-Mystery of The Missing Original, SOLVED! Pages Of Independence todayJuly 3, 2020 25
Michael A Todd on February 21, 2013 Do you still intend to post the transcript of your rant. I had assumed that the parenthetical “See transcript …here” at the top of the post would turn into a link but as yet it has not. I missed this segment and before commenting further I wanted to be sure I understood our most sagacious hosts’ objections correctly. Log in to Reply
Brandon on February 21, 2013 So Mike, do humor a deceitful liar such as myself and enlighten me: where is it do you dig up this distaste for those who embrace the libertarian(notice I am not capitalizing the word) label, when many of the people to whom you refer in agreement also embrace the label? Ron Paul so much so that he ran under that party’s banner. I have been listening to you most days for over a year so that rules out your option B. Log in to Reply
TheKingDude on February 21, 2013 This was explained VERBALLY in hour 1 of today’s fine example of radio broadcasting. You can listen to it On Demand Log in to Reply
Brandon on February 21, 2013 I was not able to listen this morning, and as your radio program has been the major reason I have continued my subscription, I am certainly not inclined to spend more money just to find out. Log in to Reply
OldRight on February 20, 2013 It may or may not be true that most libertarian anarchists reject a transcendent order, but it is not at all necessary to this political philosophy. They are not mutually exclusive. That’s very important to understand. Take a look at, e.g., _Libertarian Anarchy_ by Gerard Casey. A whole host of religious and culturally conservative libertarians exist, including scholars like Dr. Thomas E. Woods, Jr. P.S., my guess is that “DonVoices” has no idea what the Thomistic arguments for God and religion are. Anybody who thinks only chumps can believe in God should read Reginald Garrigou-Lagrange or Edward Feser. Log in to Reply
TheKingDude on February 20, 2013 So DonVoices, what race/age of human WAS “free” ? Those of the “paper age” the “papyrus age” or perhaps those who could not rationalize that killing their fellow male neanderthals made hunting the antelope more difficult? (Oh the tyranny of a dominant neanderthal, what would Kant & Rousseau think!?) If we look at the ages of human achievement do we find mysticism and star charts or do we find divinity and a transcendant? Did the star charters survive their own hubris when freed of “fascists”? Russell Kirk was correct when he penned “Chirping Sectaries” which you can find posted on this website. Log in to Reply
Steve Cunningham on February 20, 2013 Here’s an example I had when wanting to run in the Libertarian party here in SC. I was told I shouldn’t be on their ticket bc of my views on abortion & gay ‘so called’ marriage. Most all libertarians I have spoken to have been totally ok with murdering babies & not calling it “violence’ or if I mentioned about jailing the doctors or parents if this (& it is) is murder I usually get “I will shot you before you step forth on my property” now which is violent? I hear being against violence but then I get told violence towards me. Most use the moral relativist line of not imposing morality on others. This is such an insane thought it is no wonder that ZERO NADA NIL society has ever survived with such a thought. Today, we have a false view of freedom. We regard freedom not as what we ought to do but whatever we can do. We have no right to do evil. Evil aka error has NO rights. I actually had a libertarian (many of them) get very upset at this statement. You have a license to do evil. Not a right. You are free to learn a language but you must follow the laws of that language & have no right to go outside it. You are free to draw a giraffe under the rules of what a giraffe looks like. You have the right to play a game but only under the rules of that game (can you imagine football having anarchist philosophy?) Someone just mentioned religion isn’t true. Ok, can you prove that accusation? b/c of what? Men? Well if men are in error, & you are a man, could you not be correct in your assumption? Or are you one of those “we have no idea but I am absolutely sure you are wrong’ type of people, DonVoices? Log in to Reply
Danielle Alexandre on February 20, 2013 My strong Christian faith is what made me become a Libertarian. My view is simple: If God himself can give us all free will than regulating morality by anyone would be to say that they are more important than God. This would be against everything I believe as a Christian. As a Libertarian I am accused of being a Godless heathen because I believe that the government does not have the authority to do anything except protect my rights. That view has also brought accusations of being an anarchist. I am in fact neither. I view my personal relationship with God as just that: personal. I generally do not write about it or talk about it in any way. I come out against any and all legislation that would deal with a moral issue. Not because I am a Godless person but because I do not feel that my personal religious convictions should be imposed on you in any way. You are free to accept or reject religion and I will fight to the death to protect that right even against our own government. I also do not believe that anarchy is the answer. I believe there is a proper role for government and that role is to protect the rights of the people from any infringement. It is inherent in all people to be a leader or a follower. In all societies there will be a government by natural attrition. People will emerge as leaders and others will follow those leaders. To say that anarchy is ever going to be an answer in society is just a falsehood that most Libertarians understand. We believe in government in it’s proper role, in court systems to settle disputes when there has been an infringements of rights and police and militias to protect our rights are not violated by enemies foreign or domestic. I was simply trying to dispel a common myth about me and the people in my party. Log in to Reply
DonVoices on February 20, 2013 What’s the difference between Minarchist and Anarchist? About one election cycle. If you’re not an anarchist yet, you will be when you realize and come to terms that the government is not free, it’s fascist and it’s not going to reverse it’s course. If you’re not atheist yet, you will be when you realize religion isn’t true, never was, does not stand for morality, but quite the opposite, and is fascist and totalitarian in nature having been developed BY FASCISTS, FOR FASCISTS to control the peasant class since the bronze age. Log in to Reply
insert_link Mike Church Presents The Red Pill Diaries Podcasts Listener Calls Crusade Channel “Rolex Quality” – The Mike Church Show todayFebruary 27, 2018 1655
The CRUSADE Channel & Mike Church Show Achieve Milestone of Episode 2,000! Celebrate “Y2K-D” With Us!
The Constitution Hour Episode 13-Why Trump IS A Natural Born Citizen & Cruz Is Not-Why The Founders Chose republicanism Over Monarchy