insert_link 1 Pile Of Prep Tuesday Pile of Prep – The Great Debate is Set: The Don vs The Demon’s Dame todayAugust 28, 2024 90 1
insert_link 1 Pile Of Prep Thursday Pile of Prep – Biden Rides Into Sunset On A Horse Who Can’t Remember His Name todayJuly 25, 2024 72 1
Wil Shrader Jr. on November 28, 2012 So the argument is not that laws abridge liberty without proper authority but that the citizen should know all the liberties that are abridged and accept those consequences? Who says “they know”? The laws books have become so bloated that we are all probably guilty of a crime without knowing. All it takes is for government to notice you and there is something an ambitious prosecutor can find to use against you. When the law can cannot be commonly understood and the illegality of a specific action is not apparent, it is oppressive and welcomes tyranny. Log in to Reply
David S. on November 27, 2012 Greetings Mr. Church, We have spoken previously about our DWI laws and the .08 BAC threshold. Of course we did not completely agree, I approached the issue from years of experience as a professional law enforcement officer and you approached it from a libertarian position. The discussion was at least civil and thought provoking. I was listening to you this morning and would have liked to call in but it was not really an option at the time. So I thought we could cover my comments here. I will freely admit email is a poor medium for debate. You appeared to hold the position that millions of citizens were incarcerated for no reason other than the possession of one gram of marijuana. I admit I am ignorant of other statutes but here in North Carolina that assertion is unlikely. I believe you are missing a point here too. A citizen knows that possessing contraband is ….illegal. He chooses to grow or receive that contraband. He chooses to consume that contraband. He knows should he be caught with that contraband that he will likely face criminal prosecution. Of course you see where I am headed with this. Log in to Reply
David S. on November 27, 2012 So that person convicted with possession offenses is not really innocent. They CHOSE to risk the consequences. Now I do believe there should be a debate on whether marijuana should be legalized, for many of the reasons you have mentioned. The prohibition era clearly indicates the problem we face today, but this issue is unrelated to the the point I initially made. Log in to Reply
TheKingDude on November 27, 2012 The guy who pours gas into a plastic container is risking incarceration too. The guy who turns in 8 shirts to Goodwil yet writes that he turned in 16 as a charity deduction is risking incarceration too. Did you know that storing fertilizer, out of doors, in unlocked containers is a felony? The point is the law has become arbitrary and capricious. Drug laws are used primarily to bridge funding gaps so bloated “law enforcement agencies” (what ever happend to Peace Officers?) can maintain their ranks and their harassment of the citizenry. Gotta keep the hoi polloi paying rates now don’t we? Log in to Reply
insert_link Mike Church Presents The Red Pill Diaries Podcasts Listener Calls Crusade Channel “Rolex Quality” – The Mike Church Show todayFebruary 27, 2018 1655
The CRUSADE Channel & Mike Church Show Achieve Milestone of Episode 2,000! Celebrate “Y2K-D” With Us!
The Constitution Hour Episode 13-Why Trump IS A Natural Born Citizen & Cruz Is Not-Why The Founders Chose republicanism Over Monarchy