Transcripts Mike Church Show- Review of 2016 Al Smith Dinner That Invited Killary Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – "Abortion, and even contraception, even in the prevention of pregnancy, is verboten in church teaching. This goes all the way back prior – this is taken directly from the gospels, directly from the Old Testament, and then passed on traditionally." Check out today’s transcript […] todaySeptember 25, 2024 18
insert_link Transcripts Michael F. Holt Book: Why the South HAD to Secede and Why Today is Even Worse todayApril 25, 2024 49
dmctygue on January 9, 2016 .I’m Drew; among other things DeLano states: “Drew, you still have the opportunity to sit there and say it’s just a coincidence. Lots of luck with that one, buddy. In the meantime, as a matter of science, there is no longer any observational basis to deny that there exists a preferred direction across the entire universe related to the special geometric planes associated with the equinoxes and the equator of planet Earth. Handle it.” I made no attempt to deny an observed preferred direction in the CMB. Nor did i comment on the CMB anisotropy vectors. I simply voiced my skepticism of the static earth hypothesis proposed by the Neo-Tychonian model. The Principle speculates about the possibility of a motionless earth. Since you and DeLano mentioned this film, criticizing it’s content is fair. My apologies, it was not my intention to be anonymous. thank you for your time Log in to Reply
dmctygue on January 8, 2016 I don’t think I’ve ever had so many words put into my mouth for me, it’s a bit unfair Mr. Dude. I prefer when those who disagree with me engage my arguments directly rather than creating strawmen for the radio. Sungennis and DeLano ardently insist that the Earth is static (i.e. it does not move or rotate). The only challenge I raised is to the static earth hypothesis advanced by these gentlemen (the Neo-Tychonian model). A preferred direction in the CMB does not prove that the mass-energy distribution of the entire universe is arranged in such a way (at every instant) which holds the Earth static as the barycenter of a rotating universe. Physicists have demonstrated that the gravitational influence imparted by extrasolar objects on the Earth is completely dwarfed by the Sun’s gravitational influence (I will gladly furnish sources upon request) (just for perspective the gravitational influence that the entire Milky Galaxy has on Earth is approx. 30 million times weaker than sun’s gravitational influence on the Earth). The Earth must therefore orbit the dominant mass as all other celestial bodies are observed to. Furthermore, a static Earth framework cannot simultaneously account for satellites which occupy geostationary orbits, low earth orbits and polar orbits. Consider the International Space Station which circumvents the globe at a period of 90 minutes. As the ISS orbits, the earth rotates beneath it (same holds true of polar orbiting sats like the google earth sat). The path that the ISS tracks across the surface of the planet cannot be accounted for if the earth is at rest. Log in to Reply
TheKingDude on January 8, 2016 WHO on Earth put words in your anonymous mouth!? Do you have any specific complaint against a specific thing aimed at YOU and your [yet unknown] specific proper noun name!? Log in to Reply
dmctygue on January 11, 2016 please refer to my second post on this topic regarding my response. i mistakenly entered a new comment rather than replying to this one. Log in to Reply
insert_link Mike Church Presents The Red Pill Diaries Podcasts Listener Calls Crusade Channel “Rolex Quality” – The Mike Church Show todayFebruary 27, 2018 1655
The CRUSADE Channel & Mike Church Show Achieve Milestone of Episode 2,000! Celebrate “Y2K-D” With Us!
The Constitution Hour Episode 13-Why Trump IS A Natural Born Citizen & Cruz Is Not-Why The Founders Chose republicanism Over Monarchy