Climate Change We Can Believe In

Freerper7; I totally agree..
I believe Obama’s intentions are more incidious then that. He is an ideologue. His arguments are mostly fallacious. He uses verbosity, argument to the man or party, “shooting the messenger”, pitting one class against the other, demagauging, selective cherry picking of statistics, versus any logical syllogism that comes to a valid conclusion. But it sounds good to the “low inforamation voter”! He prays upon the ignorant, telling them what they want to hear, providing the government solution, for which “I” am giving “You” the people.. “I” am protecting “You” the sheeple. ..a true populist, and a benevolent King.

He creates a victim to achieve this. He then uses his fallacious arguments to support that victim with a solution, of bigger government, more programs, more money to be spent, with an empathy of the victim. He can make the victim, a criminal, and a criminal the victim (such as law abiding gun owners being made into a criminal). Thus the victim for whatever reason is in a quip pro quo relationship with government, owing a loyalty for being given something, for which Obama, and others do not have the constitutional authority to give. To further this, he has shown a proclivity to “executive authority” as a political statment, to give what the people want overriding the Congress, and using the excuse that “something must be done”. We must be saved, and he is our savior…”I” will do it for “You”, and thus “You” the victim is saved…He conveniently provides the solution, for which the oppostion is in the position of the problem, preventing it from happening. He and the Democrats are doing this so well, that in an attempt to moderate, the right ACCEPTS a waterdown version of the solution, which is still big goverment, jsut not as big….