Mandeville, LA – The EPA is getting into the LGBTQrstlne fan-boy business now by conducting an all-important survey to catalogue all EPA employees sexual preferences and what “gender” they currently identify with. I am puzzled though as to why the usual suspect, ACLU types aren’t screaming “invasion of privacy” and “unconstitutional!” over this massive data gathering?
The email sent last week by EPA Chief of Staff Matt Fritz announced a “ground-breaking” pilot program that will allow employees to answer survey questions about their sexuality.
“A professional, productive, and inclusive workplace is essential to our mission of protecting human health and the environment,” Fritz wrote. “Today EPA is taking a crucial step forward and playing a leadership role for the federal government in equal employment opportunity and diversity and inclusion by piloting the collection of voluntary, self-disclosed sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) workforce data.”
If my boss came and asked me to fill forms out identifying what conditions and positions I was currently having sex in I would tell him a few things about sand and how to pound it. Yet, I’ve heard nary a peep from EPA employees or left-wing “privacy advocates”. Viewing what the now Orwellian EPA plans to do with their newly gathered SINsus data, why isn’t anyone creeped out about the following:
“When collected, safely stored, and analyzed along with other demographic information, SOGI data serve as an important resource for developing workforce engagement strategies and improving organizational performance.”
Safely stored where, on Hillary’s servers? Analyzed for what purpose, forming in-house knitting clubs for men becoming women and weightlifting for women becoming men? What “strategies” could possibly be formed by my employer knowing that I prefer laying prone or at attention of my knees during sex!? Isn’t the possibility for abuse of the data as much a danger as what could be gained from its use? Ahhhhhh, but you see folks, logic and simple common sense play no role in our coardly-new-world of perpetual sexual metamorphosis where the only wrong is being right in the moral, traditional sense of the word. In the rush to endorse and force acceptance of any fad of sexuality caution has been thrown to hot-air of LGBTQrstlne propaganda.
At least the warfare-state crowd has an excuse: any personal data obtained from anyone is useful in the “war on terror”, what’s the ACLU, GLAAD and Tim Cook’s excuse?