Must Be Accused Before You Can Be Pardoned

todayDecember 12, 2016 1

share close

CRUSADE_Coffee_Mugs-1024x576Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript“Traditionally, before you can be pardoned, you have to be accused of something.  Then you have to be convicted of it.  I realize that in our modern world we can’t be bothered with following these formulas.  I’m being an old fuddy-duddy here.  Traditionally that’s the way it works.  You’re accused of something and then you go to trial.”  Check out today’s transcript for the rest….

Begin Mike Church Show Transcript

Mike:  The winnowing down or the devolution of the individual is terribly dangerous.  We see this in the authority of the parent.  You might ask: How have I lost my parental authority?  If the kid wants to take my car today and I say no, then I’ve still got parental authority.  That you do.  If the child says, “I don’t wanna eat broccoli” and you say, “No, you’re going to eat the broccoli,” that’s parental authority.  That’s not the kind of parental authority that God had in mind when he gave us the Fourth Commandment.  The parental authority that God had in mind was that you as the parent have the authority that must be respected and cannot be abridged in the rearing of your children.  The ultimate goal, our careers as souls here on this Earth, are for what purpose, class?  What is the purpose of our career here on Earth?  Our career here on Earth, our purpose is to get to a blessed eternity.  That’s our purpose.  That’s the ultimate purpose.  We’re all parents specifically to assist the Church and Almighty God himself and Our Lord, the Holy Ghost, the Trinity, in getting that soul into a blessed eternity.

When the State gets in the way of that, it has performed the ultimate act of interference of parental authority.  The State does this with punishing success, regularly.  When we send our children off into this paradigm, this  disastrous, horrid paradigm that we call public education, when your little darling goes out to get on the bus today, if you’re not a homeschooler, you just lost parental authority.  You surrendered it to what is alleged to be the common good.  It’s not for the common good.  It’s for the good of the elite.  You know how I know this?  Because the elite benefit from it.  They continue to benefit from it.

[private FP-Monthly|FP-Yearly|FP-Yearly-WLK|FP-Yearly-So76]

I don’t want to get too far off in the weeds here.  Without parental authority, then families cannot be families as God intended them to be.  That means that governments can’t have people to be in governments the way God intended them to be.  There are two perfect societies that we will encounter during our career here on Earth.  How do you like that, career on Earth?  By the way, that’s St. Alphonsus Liguori; that’s not me.  Two perfect entities that we will encounter, one is the Church and the other is the State.  The Church informs the State.  The Church tells the State what the moral law is, end of story, full stop.  Sorry, State, you don’t get a vote on it.  See prior to Henry VIII.  Even Henry VIII, before he went mad and went heretic, acknowledged this.  Yes, the State of England is powerful, but it’s not as powerful as the State of the Church.  The Pope has the ultimate authority to tell me whether or not I am canonically or morally or magisterially correct in marrying Catherine of Aragon.

Again, you’ll learn all this if you just go and buy the book, The English Reformation by Gerard Culkin, edited and modernized by yours truly.  It’s a historical restoration project.  You can still get a first US printing copy.  It’s going to be very rare and worth a lot more in years hence than it is worth today.  You’ll learn this.  Why is all this important?  You’re going to hear in one of these clips Julian Assange basically tell you what I just told you, and that is that our elite ruling masters are not going to allow Donald Trump to be elected.  No matter what the polls say, no matter how many people turn out, even if he wins in a landslide, they’re not going to allow it.  Did you know that the Dumbocrat Party has already dispatched a battalion of attorneys to Florida?  Immediately, as soon as Florida goes to Trump – and it’s going to – as soon as Florida is called for Trump, the DNC is going to sue.  They’re going to sue against the election results.  As soon as New Hampshire and North Carolina are proclaimed, because these are supposed to be properties of the Dumbocrat Party, that they went for Donald Trump, the Dumbocrat National Circus, the DNC, is going to sue.

Folks, you need to get yourselves a subscription because this is what’s coming our way.  Mark, if you’re listening, you know this.  We are in for a repeat of 2000.  Pray that Trump wins in a landslide so that the contested results don’t occur.  I believe, peering into the future, that the opposing forces that are going to be brought to bear here might bring about the revolution so many of you fear has always been in play.  Dangerous times in which we live, folks.

There are a couple clips here I’d like to play for you from the Russia Today website with Julian Assange, who was interviewed by John Pilger.  I’m having trouble loading this for some reason.  Maybe because so many people are trying to play it.  That would make sense to me.  This thing is not going to load.  There are so many people trying to watch this video and trying to download it.  That server is just getting clobbered.  I can tell because I am on a fiber-optic connection here.  I have 200 MB/sec downstream.  If it was coming from them fluently, it would play fluently.  I’m just going to let that build up a little buffer, shall we say.

Trump in the wingsA few other things I’d like to cover on today’s broadcast.  Ross Douthat of the New York Times, headline, “An Election Is Not a Suicide Mission.”  Folks, this is disturbing.  In it you’ll read Douthat pondering how it is that moral people could possibly cast a vote for Donald Trump.  In his pondering this, he basically says it’s okay for a couple million babies to be aborted if that’s what keeps Trump out of the White House.  I’m paraphrasing this, but that’s basically the conclusion.  Again, dark times in which we live, folks.

Then we have this.  You won’t believe this one, folks.  I don’t believe this one.  At is a story, “Should Obama just pardon Hillary?”  The story is this.  This professor of law, J. Stephen Clark at the Albany Law School basically says that Hillary is guilty.  Well, he says this is all trumped up, actually.  Just thinking out loud that she may have committed some of these crimes, or enough people out there are fantasizing about her committing these crimes, what Obama ought to do, after Mrs. Clinton’s landslide election, which, by the way, I say is not going to happen.  The opposite is going to happen.  After Mrs. Clinton’s landslide election, in order to prevent lawsuits and indictments and investigations from coming to bear on her, Obama ought to pardon her.

Traditionally, before you can be pardoned, you have to be accused of something.  Then you have to be convicted of it.  I realize that in our modern world we can’t be bothered with following these formulas.  I’m being an old fuddy-duddy here.  Traditionally that’s the way it works.  You’re accused of something and then you go to trial.  Then, if you’re convicted, then, if a governor or president has a pardon or clemency power, they can use it.  I’ve never heard of anyone being pardoned in advance of being charged with the crime.  Just think about the optics of this here.

It’s almost like it’s a Brawndo moment.  [mocking] “Wait a minute.  So you’re saying you want us to put water on the crops?”  “Yes.”  “Water, like out of the toilet?”  So what you want us to do here is you want us to pardon Mrs. Clinton for a crime?  Yes.  You mean a crime she hasn’t even been accused of?  Yes, that’s the idea.  Think about that.  This is an admission from a member of the outer circle, that I talk to you about all the time, of the ruling elite.  This is an admission here that there is not only smoke but there’s fire here.


We must allow our new president, we must allow Ahilla the Hun in her finest brightly-colored Kim Jong-il pantsuit – does anybody other than me notice that Hillary dresses like Kim Jong-il used to dress?  We must allow her, you see, to govern freely.  [mocking] “So what she committed these global crimes?”  By the way, these crimes aren’t just innocuous crimes.  They’re not just crimes against – [mocking] “Mitter Church, please!  Who was harmed?”  You were harmed.  I was harmed.  Great disrepute was brought to the system of American government.  We were all harmed.  We’ve all been scandalized.  If you’ve ever believed that we have a system of laws and that we formerly had a constitution under which we were governed, you were injured by this.

Folks, I’m telling you the interest in the corruption of Mrs. Clinton increases every day.  I’m going to try to get this clip to play.  It’s been nine minutes now.  That’s how many people are trying to hit this thing.  Only 40 seconds of the clip have loaded in the browser.  If you’re wondering, I have a hotlink to do speed checks to make sure that my connection hasn’t been regulated or dialed down by AT&T because I didn’t pay the bill or something like that.  I have full bandwidth here.  You just can’t get the file.  The file is this: “Assange: Clinton & ISIS funded by same money…”  That’s the digital media file.


In the second excerpt from the John Pilger Special, to be exclusively broadcast by RT on Saturday, courtesy of Dartmouth Films, Julian Assange accuses Hillary Clinton of misleading Americans about the true scope of Islamic State’s support from Washington’s Middle East allies.

In a 2014 email made public by Assange’s WikiLeaks last month, Hillary Clinton, who had served as secretary of state until the year before, urges John Podesta, then an advisor to Barack Obama, to “bring pressure” on Qatar and Saudi Arabia, “which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to ISIL [Islamic State, IS, ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups.”

McClure_Tables_Logo“I think this is the most significant email in the whole collection,” Assange . . .

[end reading]

FOLKS, a message from Mike – The Project 76 features, Church Doctrine videos and everything else on this site are supported by YOU. We have over 70, of my personally designed, written, produced and directed products for sale in the Founders Tradin’ Post, 24/7,  here. You can also support our efforts with a Founders Pass membership granting total access to years of My work for just .23 cents per day. Thanks for 17 years of mike! – Mike

Mike:  The other thing to note here – and there are so many of these emails that we could go through – is that the collusion that was taking place was taking place while Mrs. Clinton was the Secretary of State.  To my knowledge, John Podesta did not work for the federal government.  He was not an employee of the State Department.  Then why is someone that’s not an employee of the State Department exchanging emails with the Secretary of State and encouraging the Secretary of State to do things with one of his political clients, which Qatar most certainly was?

End Mike Church Show Transcript

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
author avatar

Written by: AbbyMcGinnis

Rate it

Post comments (0)

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Notify of
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Would love your thoughts, please comment.x