Daily Clip

Welfare Is Fine But Not When It Comes From The State

todayMarch 21, 2013 7

Background
  • cover play_arrow

    Welfare Is Fine But Not When It Comes From The State AbbyMcGinnis

Mandeville, LA – Exclusive Transcript – The female in the classical, biological sense of the word ultimately is receiving welfare, and she used to receive welfare from the husband, the spouse, the male.  Now she receives welfare from the state or, in many instances, some form of employment.  Check out today’s audio and transcript for the rest…

  • cover play_arrow

    Welfare Is Fine But Not When It Comes From The State AbbyMcGinnis

 

Begin Mike Church Show Transcript

republican-shirt-ifyouhavetoask1Mike:  Hello, JD, you are on The Mike Church Show.  How you doing?

Caller JD:  Hello, Mike.  I find a correlation of the welfare state and the decline of our families extremely similar.

Mike:  Okay.

Caller JD:  The State has made the family group obsolete by giving welfare freely to anybody that thinks they need it or refuses to work.  They’ve made the man obsolete in the family group.  Any woman can have two or three children by different fathers, get on welfare, and eliminate the need for a man in her existence.

Mike:  While I believe you’re largely correct.  It’s also fair to say that any woman can have two or three children and seek the welfare of a man.  We as conservatives don’t often complete our arguments.  Let’s complete the argument.  We don’t want our daughters going out and procreating outside of marriage.  We certainly don’t want them procreating outside of marriage and then becoming wards of the State.  We don’t want them on social, government, civic, public welfare; however, we do — this is how you complete the argument, you must complete it — want our daughters to be fruitful and multiply, as the Bible tells us to.  In doing so we hope and pray to our God, our savior Jesus Christ, to the saints, we pray that they find a man who will provide that general welfare.  There used to be a term, an axiom, an adage “He’s a good provider.  I suppose you can marry him, he’ll be a good provider.”  What are you providing?  You’re providing general welfare.  The female in the classical, biological sense of the word ultimately is receiving welfare, and she used to receive welfare from the husband, the spouse, the male.  Now she receives welfare from the state or, in many instances, some form of employment.

For more on Ben Franklin, pick up your copy of The Spirit of 76 right here!
For more on Ben Franklin, pick up your copy of The Spirit of 76 right here!

That is a tough road to hoe.  That is a very difficult road to walk, to self-fund a family and to try and fund it individually.  If we finish the argument, we should never say we’re never against our women receiving welfare.  We should always say we wish them to receive the welfare of their spouse.  In doing so, you’ve given the liberal now something that he or she does not want to deal with.  They don’t want to have to talk about that.  Hell, the mealy-mouth conservatives out there that call themselves conservatives don’t want to have to deal with that.  They don’t want people finishing the argument.  If you finish the argument, you depower or disempower the State to step in.  As long as the State is powerful and as long as the State can do these things, it’s going to do them.  As it does them, what does it do?  It diminishes the general welfare provided, as I said, classically and biologically speaking.  That’s a good call, a good point.  Thank you very much.

End Mike Church Show Transcript

Welfare-State1

author avatar
AbbyMcGinnis

Written by: AbbyMcGinnis

Rate it

Post comments (1)

Leave a reply

  1. charlotte koops on March 22, 2013

    That was an interesting dialog. Thank you, Mike, for all you do. From a Christian perspective, I agree and so appreciate how you always start from a Biblical base which is, of course, all truth. From my female perspective, it is not only that the husband provides for the general welfare of his wife (being a “good provider” but certainly is EQALLY the other way as well, where the wife provides for the general welfare of her husband. Together then as a team working for the general welfare of their family created together but also the general welfare of their community (neighbors) around them. That seems to complete the argument on how we’ve come to so many BROKEN families….or those that were never families in the first place…..on the state’s welfare program.

    I tuned in this morning to “Sirius Patriot ” and you wern’t there to our (my husband & I) chagrin.

    God bless, dear one.

    Charlotte (from Charlotte NC)


0%